Jaspers was right after all – delusions are distinct from normal beliefs
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Jaspers was right after all--delusions are distinct from normal beliefs. For.
Jaspers’ textbook General Psychopathology has in the past been described as the ‘most important single book on the aims and logic of psychological medicine’ (Shepherd, 1990). In recent years it seems to have rather fallen off the psychiatric syllabus. Its diminished importance is exemplified by changing opinions about delusions. Nowadays, delusions are considered by many to lie on a continuum w...
متن کاملKarl Jaspers and the genesis of delusions in schizophrenia.
In his General Psychopathology, Karl Jaspers identifies two stages in the genesis of delusions in schizophrenia. The first is a set of primary subjective experiences, which he encompasses under the rubric of “delusional atmosphere,”1 building upon F.W. Hagen’s construct of “delusional mood.”2 The second is the patient’s “working through” those experiences, sometimes “calling for the full streng...
متن کاملKarl Jaspers and the Genesis of delusions in Schizophrenia
In his General Psychopathology, Karl Jaspers identifies two stages in the genesis of delusions in schizophrenia. The first is a set of primary subjective experiences, which he encompasses under the rubric of “delusional atmosphere,”1 building upon F.W. Hagen’s construct of “delusional mood.”2 The second is the patient’s “working through” those experiences, sometimes “calling for the full streng...
متن کاملDelusions and Other Irrational Beliefs
Delusional people are people saying very bizarre things like they are dead, their spouse is a robot, the TV star is talking to them, they are possessed by the devil, aliens are following them, and so on. Even though we know that they are not identical, terms like “delusion” and “mental illness” are often used as synonyms in ordinary language. This comes from what psychopathology tradition hande...
متن کاملDelusions as harmful malfunctioning beliefs
Delusional beliefs are typically pathological. Being pathological is clearly distinguished from being false or being irrational. Anna might falsely believe that his husband is having an affair but it might just be a simple mistake. Again, Sam might irrationally believe, without good evidence, that he is smarter than his colleagues, but it might just be a healthy self-deceptive belief. On the ot...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: British Journal of Psychiatry
سال: 2003
ISSN: 0007-1250,1472-1465
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.183.4.285